Editing Talk:Anti-Saïx

{{EO|happytext=Strategy...Should this be on this page, seeing as Anti-Saix uses the same tactics as Saix? I don't think so, and KrytenKoro, thanks for making this a cleaner looking page. I tend to overwrite...}}
{{DarkestofHearts|text= Hello AntiSaix, wow this page is empty. Are you new? I am, my talk page has a little bit of talking.}}
{{EO|happytext=No. I've been on a few weeks. And this page used to be full, but Kryten cleaned it up. We need to keep it cleaner, as this article will be scrapped and rewritten many times, until the release of 358/2 Days in English...}}

{{KrytenKoro|Just as an explanation for the changes:

"It could use the same abilities as Saïx, but to a lesser extent. Anti-Saïx wields a dark version of the Lunatic, becoming berserk in a means of gaining power. This enemy also has the same amount of health as its Nobody counterpart. Anti-Saïx can only be fought when playing during mission mode."

I simplified this to "It's a dark version of Saix" and "It replaces him in Mission 91", which get the same point across. There could easily be a strategy section, though, that covers this more fully.

"*Anti-Saïx appears in Mission Mode because Saïx is playable. "

This was completely redundant to the lead paragraph.

"*Anti-Saïx doesn't have a voice, as do all other Anti-characters."

This seems to imply that other Anti's have voices, which is untrue - however, none of these guys, or Heartless or Nobodies have voices unless they're human again, so the note is kind of obvious either way.

As for the hack bit - you can replace your facsimile with pretty much any model in any game, and it will probably behave buggy, so hack's aren't worth mentioning unless the subject does not actually appear in the game proper, and is only a remnant of earlier data.}}
{{EO||talktext=Sounds good. Thanks, KrytenKoro-san. ^_^}}

== Combination ==

{{Ghostboy3000|Time=22:57, September 9, 2009 (UTC)|text= This could be called A noheartbody.}}
{{DTN|time=22:58, September 9, 2009 (UTC)|text=Absolutely not. We cannot just "make up" a name for this enemy. It seems more likely to be a Heartless to me, anyways.}}
{{Ghostboy3000|text=n I didn't mean it Literally. It was a theory.}}

== Anti-Saix Vs. AntiSaix ==

{{Xion4ever|time=01:16, October 19, 2009 (UTC)|text=How is it that the ''Anti-Riku'' page was deleted, yet the ''Anti-Saix'' page still exists? Shouldn't we rename the article to '''AntiSaix'''?}}
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{EO|happytext=Strategy...Should this be on this page, seeing as Anti-Saix uses the same tactics as Saix? I don't think so, and KrytenKoro, thanks for making this a cleaner looking page. I tend to overwrite...}}
-{{DOH|text= Hello AntiSaix, wow this page is empty. Are you new? I am, my talk page has a little bit of talking.}}
+{{DarkestofHearts|text= Hello AntiSaix, wow this page is empty. Are you new? I am, my talk page has a little bit of talking.}}
 {{EO|happytext=No. I've been on a few weeks. And this page used to be full, but Kryten cleaned it up. We need to keep it cleaner, as this article will be scrapped and rewritten many times, until the release of 358/2 Days in English...}}
@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 {{Xion4ever|time=01:16, October 19, 2009 (UTC)|text=How is it that the ''Anti-Riku'' page was deleted, yet the ''Anti-Saix'' page still exists? Shouldn't we rename the article to '''AntiSaix'''?}}
-Anti-Saix is the correct name, as is Anti-Riku.[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Glorious</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>CHAOS!</small>]] 03:45, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
-== Anti-Saix HP ==
-His hp is different from Saix's. First, there are six bars not including the bar he begins with that isn't a full bar (maybe). The extra hp that isn't put into a bar form is a little longer than Saix's extra hp that wasn't put into bar form. Does anyone know how to measure their hp correctly? Edit: Sorry, I forgot to put my signiture --[[User:Xsonicdragon|Xsonicdragon]] 02:06, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
-:We don't know what the base stats are for mission mode, but that's what changes, not the unique hp factor of the enemy.[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Glorious</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>CHAOS!</small>]] 03:31, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
-==Ultimania==
-Doesn't Ultimania state what it is?--[[User:Xabryn|Xabryn]] 21:48, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
-== Questioning the Scar? ==
-Having taken the image into Photoshop, there does in fact seem to be a scar on its face, or at least a patch of lighter pixels that doesn't seem consistent with shading and, knowing Days' screen resolution issues, could in fact be an X. Of course, why has nobody ripped Anti-Saïx's texture to look at it? ''<small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:80.192.220.35|80.192.220.35]] ([[User talk:80.192.220.35|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/80.192.220.35|contribs]])</small>''
-:The texture is really tiny, so there is not much to see. I uploaded Saïx's original face texture for reference. --{{User:ShardofTruth/Sig}} 18:07, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
-:http://i794.photobucket.com/albums/yy230/ShardofTruth/Other%20KH%20stuff/def_saix_01.png http://i794.photobucket.com/albums/yy230/ShardofTruth/Other%20KH%20stuff/132_saix_h_01.png http://i794.photobucket.com/albums/yy230/ShardofTruth/Other%20KH%20stuff/SaixFace2.png
-==Heartless or Nobody?==
-When has this been confirmed that Anti-Saix is a Nobody? If it hasn't been confirmed and whoever put that info on here was just guessing, then I think it should be changed because I'm pretty sure Anti-Saix is a Heartless, like Anti-Riku. Why would he be a Nobody? Just because Saix is a Nobody? Because if so, then I don't think that's enough info to go on at all to prove that he's a Nobody. His design seems to point towards him being a Heartless. --[[User:Elfdemon|Elfdemon]] ([[User talk:Elfdemon|talk]]) 06:48, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
-:He's listed as Nobody in the Ultimania and probably in the Bradygames guide too. These enemies are not canon anyway (because they are multiplayer-mode only) so there is no need to start a lore discussion about them.--{{User:ShardofTruth/Sig}} [[User:ShardofTruth|ShardofTruth]] ([[User talk:ShardofTruth|talk]]) 17:39, 20 January 2016 (UTC)