User talk:KeybladeSpyMaster: Difference between revisions

Line 96: Line 96:
How is that consistent with the wiki's directive to eliminate trivia sections, as covered in the manual of style? And where else do we list misspellings in trivia sections?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 20:26, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
How is that consistent with the wiki's directive to eliminate trivia sections, as covered in the manual of style? And where else do we list misspellings in trivia sections?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 20:26, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
:Also, how is that not brief enough?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 20:26, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
:Also, how is that not brief enough?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 20:26, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
::Sure. A search for "Trivia" brings up most or all articles on the wiki containing Trivia sections. Multiple articles on site, including [[Marluxia]], [[Braig]], and [[Disney Castle]], list information like these misspellings, which are comparatively insignificant but noteworthy development errors or changes, as trivia. As far as how it's not brief, the manual of style states: "The first sentence in the introduction should briefly define the subject of the article..." Spelling mistakes are not defining the subjects, and are therefore simply extending unnecessarily the opening sentence.
::As for a directive to eliminate trivia sections, I believe that was something from a few years ago, no? In any case, the Manual of Style does not prohibit trivia sections, but rather discourages the trivia that is based in speculation. {{KeybladeSpyMaster/Sig}} 20:39, 23 October 2018 (UTC)