53,710
edits
User talk:Neumannz: Difference between revisions
→NEZZY!: new section
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) (→NEZZY!: new section) |
|||
| Line 1,266: | Line 1,266: | ||
Can you perform "shockwave" to "shock wave" and "Shockwave" to "Shock Wave" with AWB? Or the other way around. Do we have any kind of in-canon support for which parsing is preferred? I think the term is used in the [[Bruiser]]'s report entry, as "shock wave", but from our notes, the command descriptions in BbS and DDD use "shockwave". Can't confirm the command descriptions at the moment, tho.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 20:43, 17 March 2016 (UTC) | Can you perform "shockwave" to "shock wave" and "Shockwave" to "Shock Wave" with AWB? Or the other way around. Do we have any kind of in-canon support for which parsing is preferred? I think the term is used in the [[Bruiser]]'s report entry, as "shock wave", but from our notes, the command descriptions in BbS and DDD use "shockwave". Can't confirm the command descriptions at the moment, tho.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 20:43, 17 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
== <big>NEZZY!</big> == | |||
<u>'''''NEZZY.'''''</u> Neeeeeeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzzzzyyyyyyy.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 22:48, 7 April 2016 (UTC) | |||