25,236
edits
No edit summary |
NinjaSheik (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::That's why we have the template. Given the fact that the only source of the name is from the Twitter, it is likely. Lots of things are cut out and changed during development, but I don't think they would just call it that for the heck of it if they weren't sure. Even if they did, it's nothing to sweat over since it's now labeled as a working name.--{{User:NinjaSheik/Sig}} 19:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC) | :::That's why we have the template. Given the fact that the only source of the name is from the Twitter, it is likely. Lots of things are cut out and changed during development, but I don't think they would just call it that for the heck of it if they weren't sure. Even if they did, it's nothing to sweat over since it's now labeled as a working name.--{{User:NinjaSheik/Sig}} 19:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::Right. I'm not trying to be difficult. I just thought we didn't allow articles for things with "working" titles/names…specifically because they are prone to change. - {{User:EternalNothingnessXIII/Sig}} 21:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC) | ::::Right. I'm not trying to be difficult. I just thought we didn't allow articles for things with "working" titles/names…specifically because they are prone to change. - {{User:EternalNothingnessXIII/Sig}} 21:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::::It's okay. When the tweet came out, a lot of articles and websites also came the same conclusion. Again, I don't think they would carelessly call it that if it wasn't a confirmed name, since no one apparently knows where the name even came from.--{{User:NinjaSheik/Sig}} 04:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC) |
edits