21,449
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{Xion4ever|time=09:43, 19 June 2011 (EDT)|text=It's not really a problem hosting them on the Wiki...instead it's more of a question: do we really need them? We already have a written gameplay section that a lot of people worked hard to get it up to par. I see adding a .gif image as a trivial/unnecesary, personally. Most gameplay sections are written out, not replaced with an image or animation. Sometimes old school writing trumps modern animation/images.}} | {{Xion4ever|time=09:43, 19 June 2011 (EDT)|text=It's not really a problem hosting them on the Wiki...instead it's more of a question: do we really need them? We already have a written gameplay section that a lot of people worked hard to get it up to par. I see adding a .gif image as a trivial/unnecesary, personally. Most gameplay sections are written out, not replaced with an image or animation. Sometimes old school writing trumps modern animation/images.}} | ||
{{Mechajin|text=I feel that some of the descriptions are inadequate. we can keep them, and have an image next to them, or on the article. we don't replace the description of fire with one of erry's gifs now, do we?}} | {{Mechajin|text=I feel that some of the descriptions are inadequate. we can keep them, and have an image next to them, or on the article. we don't replace the description of fire with one of erry's gifs now, do we?}} | ||
We're not relying on Erry's .gifs for demonstrating the detailed effects of fire, either, which is essentially what you're proposing. Images and .gifs are just basic illustrations, and considering the work that needs to go into .gifs for each weapon (not 828, though, since not every weapon has a Y-Combo), it is simply not worth it, unless you want to spend the time and effort in doing it yourself. --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 11:01, 19 June 2011 (EDT) |
edits