Editing KHWiki:Votes for featured articles/2010

From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FANav}}
{| class="infobox" style="width:300px; float: right; border: 1px #AAAAAA solid; "
|-
!align="center" colspan="3"|[[File:Moogle (Art).png|50px|Archive]]<br/>[[wikipedia:Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page|Archives]]
----
|-
|[[File:Limit Recharge KHD.png]] [[Kingdom Hearts Wiki:VFFA Archive 01|2008]] [[File:Limit Recharge KHD.png]] [[Forum:Featured Articles|2009]] [[File:Limit Recharge KHD.png]] [[Kingdom Hearts Wiki:VFFA Archive 02|2010]] [[File:Limit Recharge KHD.png]] [[Kingdom Hearts Wiki:VFFA Archive 03|2011]] [[File:Limit Recharge KHD.png]] [[Kingdom Hearts Wiki:VFFA Archive 04|2012]]<br>[[File:Limit Recharge KHD.png]] [[Kingdom Hearts Wiki:VFFA Archive 05|2013]] [[File:Limit Recharge KHD.png]] [[Kingdom Hearts Wiki:VFFA Archive 06|2014]] [[File:Limit Recharge KHD.png]] [[KHWiki:Votes for Featured Articles|2015]]
|}


This page serves as an archive for past [[KHWiki:Votes for featured articles|votes for featured articles]] discussions.
This page serves as an archive for past [[Kingdom Hearts Wiki:Votes for Featured Articles|Votes for Featured Articles]] discussions.


== December 2010 ==
== December 2010 ==
Line 26: Line 32:


'''<center><big><big><big> <big><big><big>BIG MISTAKE</big></big></big> </big></big></big></center>'''
'''<center><big><big><big> <big><big><big>BIG MISTAKE</big></big></big> </big></big></big></center>'''
The article is still very messy and is not completely consistent with the format of our other game articles. Also, whoever nominated and supported this seemed to forget that all featured articles should follow the manual of style, be written well, and not have any maintenance issues. You can see a missing <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> tag in the bottom of the page, was that not obvious enough?
The article is still very messy and is not completely consistent with the format of our other game articles. Also, whoever nominated and supported this seemed to forget that all Featured Articles should follow the manual of style, be written well, and not have any maintenance issues. You can see a missing <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> tag in the bottom of the page, was that not obvious enough?


But I digress. [[100 Acre Wood]] is the only quality article that comes to mind right now for October.
But I digress. [[100 Acre Wood]] is the only quality article that comes to mind right now for October.
----
----
EDIT: This is not to be taken offensively, but just to remind all of the staffers that an article should be thoroughly inspected before being nominated, and not to just nominate an article because it fits into the time frame. Thanks!}}
EDIT: This is not to be taken offensively, but just to remind all of the staffers that an article should be thoroughly inspected before being nominated, and not to just nominate an article because it fits into the time frame. Thanks!}}
{{EO|time=19:16, October 1, 2010 (UTC)|annoyed=The only reason you think [[100 Acre Wood]] is such a masterpiece is because YOU revised it, DTN. That's not a fair enough judgment/reason to nominate an article. ''Birth by Sleep'' was elected to sort of tie-in to the wiki's theme and also encourage users to edit the article, as well as articles based on it with the new information the English adaptions revealed.  
{{EO|time=19:16, October 1, 2010 (UTC)|annoyed=The only reason you think [[100 Acre Wood]] is such a masterpiece is because YOU revised it, DTN. That's not a fair enough judgment/reason to nominate an article. ''Birth by Sleep'' was elected to sort of tie-in to the Wiki's theme and also encourage users to edit the article, as well as articles based on it with the new information the English adaptions revealed.  


I'd say, in the spirit of Halloween being in October, the stereotypical thing to do would be nominate a Halloween-based article, so we at least acknowledge it in some way, even though switching to a temporary Halloween theme is completely pointless. So I'd like to nominate [[Halloween Town]], simply on the  grounds that it's based on the best stop-motion film of all time, has appeared in almost every game, has a great storyline, and makes the Heartless encountered there look totally awesome! Granted it could still use some work, that can all be changed in time.}}
I'd say, in the spirit of Halloween being in October, the stereotypical thing to do would be nominate a Halloween-based article, so we at least acknowledge it in some way, even though switching to a temporary Halloween theme is completely pointless. So I'd like to nominate [[Halloween Town]], simply on the  grounds that it's based on the best stop-motion film of all time, has appeared in almost every game, has a great storyline, and makes the Heartless encountered there look totally awesome! Granted it could still use some work, that can all be changed in time.}}
Line 44: Line 50:
Given the direction of where this is going, I'm going to flat out say I'm not going to be the sole decision maker here.  I want to hear from other staff members.  We've got them and we need more input from them as well.  We'll delay the vote until Monday to make a final decision.}}
Given the direction of where this is going, I'm going to flat out say I'm not going to be the sole decision maker here.  I want to hear from other staff members.  We've got them and we need more input from them as well.  We'll delay the vote until Monday to make a final decision.}}


{{Chihuahuaman|time=22:35, October 2, 2010 (UTC)|text=What about [[Olympus Coliseum]]? It has appeared in every {{c|Kingdom Hearts|series}} game and it offers a challenge everytime.}}
{{Chihuahuaman|time=22:35, October 2, 2010 (UTC)|text=What about [[Olympus Coliseum]]? It has appeared in every [[Kingdom Hearts (series)|Kingdom Hearts]] game and it offers a challenge everytime.}}


{{Chihuahuaman|time=22:36, October 2, 2010 (UTC)|text=Oh, sorry. It is probably a mod only thing. My bad.}}
{{Chihuahuaman|time=22:36, October 2, 2010 (UTC)|text=Oh, sorry. It is probably a mod only thing. My bad.}}
Line 76: Line 82:


Part of the problem with using the BBS worlds is that they're technically not finished until we get the release here, since I'm sure bits will change, and, as Xion mentioned, the spoiler issues.  Besides, Land of Dragons is a nice example of an article for a world that has so far appeared in a single game.}}
Part of the problem with using the BBS worlds is that they're technically not finished until we get the release here, since I'm sure bits will change, and, as Xion mentioned, the spoiler issues.  Besides, Land of Dragons is a nice example of an article for a world that has so far appeared in a single game.}}
{{DTN|time=03:47, August 30, 2010 (UTC)|text=Hola, señors y señoritas. I have a bit of news for us that might change our plans. Even though we all know that Room Core should have been the featured media for September, it looks like we are going to be putting up some art of the Land of Departure. I'm still hoping that everyone spontaneously changes their vote to the much superior Room Core, but in the event that doesn't happen, we may want to reconsider putting Land of Departure up as the Featured Article. Personally, I'm not sure how good or non-rigged it would look to have our featured media and Featured Article correspond with each other. At the same time, it might be nice, since ''Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep'' is just around the corner. Hooray!
{{DTN|time=03:47, August 30, 2010 (UTC)|text=Hola, señors y señoritas. I have a bit of news for us that might change our plans. Even though we all know that Room Core should have been the Featured Media for September, it looks like we are going to be putting up some art of the Land of Departure. I'm still hoping that everyone spontaneously changes their vote to the much superior Room Core, but in the event that doesn't happen, we may want to reconsider putting Land of Departure up as the Featured Article. Personally, I'm not sure how good or non-rigged it would look to have our Featured Media and Featured Article correspond with each other. At the same time, it might be nice, since ''Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep'' is just around the corner. Hooray!


Anyway, I did a long, drastic cleanup of [[100 Acre Wood]] yesterday that should make it a model article. Plus, it's whimsical. If we find that we need to change our decision for Featured Article, I think this would be the way to go.
Anyway, I did a long, drastic cleanup of [[100 Acre Wood]] yesterday that should make it a model article. Plus, it's whimsical. If we find that we need to change our decision for Featured Article, I think this would be the way to go.
Line 93: Line 99:


Now 100 Acre Wood...good grief, DTN.  That's a thing of beauty.  That's how a good world article should look.  Granted, it's got multiple games to support it, but it's also well-organized, nicely annotated, and bursting with info.  I'm all about the Pooh.}}
Now 100 Acre Wood...good grief, DTN.  That's a thing of beauty.  That's how a good world article should look.  Granted, it's got multiple games to support it, but it's also well-organized, nicely annotated, and bursting with info.  I'm all about the Pooh.}}
{{Maggosh|nathan=Sorry, Kate, you seem to have misunderstood me. I said, '''along with''' the Land of Departure in featured media; I was agreeing with ENX on Birth by Sleep's article.}}
{{Maggosh|nathan=Sorry, Kate, you seem to have misunderstood me. I said, '''along with''' the Land of Departure in Featured Media; I was agreeing with ENX on Birth by Sleep's article.}}
{{BebopKate|time=23:34, September 1, 2010 (UTC)|text=Ah yes, so you did.  Sorry, it's been a long day at work.
{{BebopKate|time=23:34, September 1, 2010 (UTC)|text=Ah yes, so you did.  Sorry, it's been a long day at work.


Line 99: Line 105:


==Sub-Discussion: Back to General Voting?==
==Sub-Discussion: Back to General Voting?==
{{BebopKate|time=18:33, August 15, 2010 (UTC)|text=Well, we, as a wiki, like to vote.  The [[KHWiki:Mirage Arena|Mirage Arena]] is a great example of that, and I have to say [[KHWiki:Votes for featured media|featured media]] has exceeded everyone's expectations, methinks.
{{BebopKate|time=18:33, August 15, 2010 (UTC)|text=Well, we, as a wiki, like to vote.  The [[Kingdom Hearts Wiki:Mirage Arena|Mirage Arena]] is a great example of that, and I have to say [[Kingdom Hearts Wiki:Votes for Featured Media|Featured Media]] has exceeded everyone's expectations, methinks.


We've improved in quality overall since we stopped featured articles, and even more so since we've re-added them as staff only.  I think we have a lot more wiki members who know what quality means and are willing to help and polish something so it's at its best.
We've improved in quality overall since we stopped Featured Articles, and even more so since we've re-added them as staff only.  I think we have a lot more wiki members who know what quality means and are willing to help and polish something so it's at its best.


Therefore, I would like to propose, in December, (for the January article, natch), we return featured articles to the hands of all the editors.  I do think we should use the same system as featured media (restrained categories), as that has worked very well in producing a wide range of winners, and perhaps borrow and modify a couple of guidelines from FF Wiki's procedures, such as so many nominees before voting starts.  If need be, we can re-tool things as we go along to make it work more smoothly, but I think this is a step we should take.
Therefore, I would like to propose, in December, (for the January article, natch), we return Featured Articles to the hands of all the editors.  I do think we should use the same system as Featured Media (restrained categories), as that has worked very well in producing a wide range of winners, and perhaps borrow and modify a couple of guidelines from FF Wiki's procedures, such as so many nominees before voting starts.  If need be, we can re-tool things as we go along to make it work more smoothly, but I think this is a step we should take.


What say you, fellow staffers?  ''Viva la editors''! (Don't hit me, TroisNyx. ^_^)}}
What say you, fellow staffers?  ''Viva la editors''! (Don't hit me, TroisNyx. ^_^)}}

Please note that all contributions to the Kingdom Hearts Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see KHWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)