Editing KHWiki:Pages for deletion/Archives/2009 JanMar

From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 86: Line 86:
{{TNE|text=If there's an evident difference in fighting style between two similar-looking enemies, then they should have their separate pages. Palette swaps should be combined. Or at least, I'm upholding that view. The same goes for [[Trick Ghost]] and [[Magic Ghost]], their pages can be combined into one.}}
{{TNE|text=If there's an evident difference in fighting style between two similar-looking enemies, then they should have their separate pages. Palette swaps should be combined. Or at least, I'm upholding that view. The same goes for [[Trick Ghost]] and [[Magic Ghost]], their pages can be combined into one.}}
::As of now, the Behemoth article does not mention Arc or Destroyed Behemoth's at all, and in fact incorrectly reports that regular Behemoth's were seen in the 1000 Heartless battle. Before any deletions occur, how about the sections be merged first?
::As of now, the Behemoth article does not mention Arc or Destroyed Behemoth's at all, and in fact incorrectly reports that regular Behemoth's were seen in the 1000 Heartless battle. Before any deletions occur, how about the sections be merged first?
::A the Digimon Wiki, we've had a similar problem, and we've dealt with it with a middle ground between the two positions advocated here. As seen in articles like [http://digimon.wikia.com/wiki/Agumon this one], each version of a "type" of enemy is given a section in the page - kind of like a list article. This method could also be applied to Red Nocturne types, so that there's not too much hair-splitting and argumentation - all of that "type" of enemy is in one article, but each gets its own section. So, Soldiers and Stealth Soldiers would be on one page, all five types of mushrooms, etc. The only problem then is figuring out a name for the entire article - I would suggest Behemoth Heartless, Wizard Heartless (as the rhapsodies/nocturnes are all said to be a subset of Wizard class), Soldier Heartless, Mushroom Heartless, etc. (or some version of that naming scheme). This way, you could
::A the Digimon Wiki, we've had a similar problem, and we've dealt with it with a middle ground between the two positions advocated here. As seen in articles like [http://digimon.wikia.com/wiki/Agumon this one], each version of a "type" of enemy is given a section in the page - kind of like a list article. This method could also be applied to Red Nocturne types, so that there's not too much hair-splitting and argumentation - all of that "type" of enemy is in one article, but each gets its own section. So, Soldiers and Stealth Soldiers would be on one page, all five types of mushrooms, etc. The only problem then is figuring out a name for the entire article - I would suggest [[Behemoth Heartless]], [[Wizard Heartless]] (as the rhapsodies/nocturnes are all said to be a subset of Wizard class), [[Soldier Heartless]], [[Mushroom Heartless]], etc. (or some version of that naming scheme). This way, you could
#Get rid of short, stubby articles, by changing them into short sections of a larger page
#Get rid of short, stubby articles, by changing them into short sections of a larger page
#Allow readers to directly and easily compare variations of a central theme
#Allow readers to directly and easily compare variations of a central theme

Please note that all contributions to the Kingdom Hearts Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see KHWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)