| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Forumheader|The Realm of Sleep|The World that Never was}} | | {{Forumheader|The World that Never was}}{{sticky}} |
|
| |
|
| <!-- Please put your content under this paragraph. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | | <!-- Please put your content under this paragraph. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> |
| Line 148: |
Line 148: |
| For the rest... yes, I know it's pretty different. A big change for everyone. But one thing I'd like to say is that this is a work in progress. We are still working on changes as we get feedback and start to give information from click-tracking and so on. One thing we are looking at is a special unit that could take infoboxes in to the right column. And we are looking at how to better handle big tables. It's worth remembering that if they are too big for the new layout, they are ''already'' broken for many screen resolutions... but we are talking about some other solutions that may help. | | For the rest... yes, I know it's pretty different. A big change for everyone. But one thing I'd like to say is that this is a work in progress. We are still working on changes as we get feedback and start to give information from click-tracking and so on. One thing we are looking at is a special unit that could take infoboxes in to the right column. And we are looking at how to better handle big tables. It's worth remembering that if they are too big for the new layout, they are ''already'' broken for many screen resolutions... but we are talking about some other solutions that may help. |
|
| |
|
| And the last thing I want to encourage, is for admins to try customizing the wiki. The blue and white look is the default (like the old "sapphire") but you can make it look very different. Have a look at [[wikia:communitytest|Community Test]], or anyone can try out the tool at [[wikia:themedesigner|themedesigner.wikia]] (even if you aren't an admin). I know this doesn't resolve all your worries, but I hope you'll try it anyway}} | | And the last thing I want to encourage, is for admins to try customizing the wiki. The blue and white look is the default (like the old "sapphire") but you can make it look very different. Have a look at [[w:c:communitytest|Community Test]], or anyone can try out the tool at [[w:c:themedesigner|themedesigner.wikia]] (even if you aren't an admin). I know this doesn't resolve all your worries, but I hope you'll try it anyway}} |
|
| |
|
| Yeah, but there's the thing. You ask for feedback, and we give it. What is the common response? '''Make it an option'''. Do yoy listen? I think you know the answer. {{The Inexistentsig}} | | Yeah, but there's the thing. You ask for feedback, and we give it. What is the common response? '''Make it an option'''. Do yoy listen? I think you know the answer. {{The Inexistentsig}} |
|
| |
|
| <!--[[File:Prt 2.png|300px]]--> - So, yeah. I only had like 10 minutes to make this, but I'll update it <small>hopefully...</small>. Mainly, it is exactly what Monaco is right now, which is the point. If we were to found our own site, I would recommend use of the MediaWiki software. I was also thinking (but didn't have time to) that we could have the background banner go all of the way to the bottom of the screen. So... anyone can update the file to what they think it should look like... {{The Inexistentsig}}
| | [[File:Prt 2.png|300px]] - So, yeah. I only had like 10 minutes to make this, but I'll update it <small>hopefully...</small>. Mainly, it is exactly what Monaco is right now, which is the point. If we were to found our own site, I would recommend use of the MediaWiki software. I was also thinking (but didn't have time to) that we could have the background banner go all of the way to the bottom of the screen. So... anyone can update the file to what they think it should look like... {{The Inexistentsig}} |
|
| |
|
| {{KKD|time=01:11, October 13, 2010 (UTC)|link=I really hate to say this, guys, but I don't think we should leave as soon as the new look is implemented, if at all. I think we should give them one month, starting November 3rd. If everything still sucks come December, we leave, no questions asked. Not that I like the new skin at all, but we may as well give them a chance. A small one, but a chance.}} | | {{KKD|time=01:11, October 13, 2010 (UTC)|link=I really hate to say this, guys, but I don't think we should leave as soon as the new look is implemented, if at all. I think we should give them one month, starting November 3rd. If everything still sucks come December, we leave, no questions asked. Not that I like the new skin at all, but we may as well give them a chance. A small one, but a chance.}} |
| Line 163: |
Line 163: |
|
| |
|
| This is how it appears for me: | | This is how it appears for me: |
| <!--
| |
| <gallery> | | <gallery> |
| File: KHWikiBroken.jpg | | File: KHWikiBroken.jpg |
| </gallery> | | </gallery> |
| -->
| |
|
| |
|
| It makes the wiki almost unusable for me. also it's not in the screenshot but the words WikiaWikiaWikiaWikiaWikia are repeated at the top of the screen.}} | | It makes the wiki almost unusable for me. also it's not in the screenshot but the words WikiaWikiaWikiaWikiaWikia are repeated at the top of the screen.}} |
| Line 226: |
Line 224: |
| #Old wiki: As you can read [http://simpsons.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:Moving_Forward here], the old KHwiki will stay here the same way we leave it, deleting pages, even it it's the will of all editors and admins, will be considerd as vandalism by the Wikia staff and reverted. So there will be basically two wikis, which kind of misses the point of moving and is an insult to all editors on top.}} | | #Old wiki: As you can read [http://simpsons.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:Moving_Forward here], the old KHwiki will stay here the same way we leave it, deleting pages, even it it's the will of all editors and admins, will be considerd as vandalism by the Wikia staff and reverted. So there will be basically two wikis, which kind of misses the point of moving and is an insult to all editors on top.}} |
|
| |
|
| {{17m|text= Okay, I opened the KHWiki and the new skin is suddenly applied, like, automatically. Does this happen to everyone?}} | | {{17master|text= Okay, I opened the KHWiki and the new skin is suddenly applied, like, automatically. Does this happen to everyone?}} |
|
| |
|
| {{Kog981|text= I can't take any more this new skin, just looking at some pages like Sora or BBS, that's creepy me out. | | {{Kog981|text= I can't take any more this new skin, just looking at some pages like Sora or BBS, that's creepy me out. |
| Line 232: |
Line 230: |
| Eh... You guys decide to move? With everything you guys done?}} | | Eh... You guys decide to move? With everything you guys done?}} |
|
| |
|
| {{Uxie|time=13:03, October 20, 2010 (UTC)|text=Grr, [[finalfantasy:Wakka|now I'm mad]]! This skin has ruined this wiki, and the SW! | | {{Uxie|time=13:03, October 20, 2010 (UTC)|text=Grr, [[w:c:finalfantasy:Wakka|now I'm mad]]! This skin has ruined this wiki, and the SW! |
|
| |
|
| Now that the new skin is up and running, I have decided to move the Spyro Wiki to ShoutWiki. If anyone wants to join us, be my guest!}} | | Now that the new skin is up and running, I have decided to move the Spyro Wiki to ShoutWiki. If anyone wants to join us, be my guest!}} |
| Line 239: |
Line 237: |
| {{DDark|time=[[User:D.Dark.|D.Dark.]] 14:37, October 20, 2010 (UTC)|text=Aww crap! The new skin looks like crap! You know what you would find if you would look up crap in the dictionary? This skin! Its weird tough, I did not get this skin a few days ago like you all did, I came to the wikia a few minutes ago to find this rotten piece of cabbage sitting right there mocking me square in the face. Thankfully after reading previous posts I found out I could revert it. | | {{DDark|time=[[User:D.Dark.|D.Dark.]] 14:37, October 20, 2010 (UTC)|text=Aww crap! The new skin looks like crap! You know what you would find if you would look up crap in the dictionary? This skin! Its weird tough, I did not get this skin a few days ago like you all did, I came to the wikia a few minutes ago to find this rotten piece of cabbage sitting right there mocking me square in the face. Thankfully after reading previous posts I found out I could revert it. |
| Anyway, this is big trouble, you guys seem to be...handling it but I don't think some of us..less caffine and sleepless editors (you know the ones who don't have thousands of edits)) could really adapt to the situation of moving. Overall no one can really adapt to this decomposed baby fat. I'm not saying it enough but the skin is CRAP! Ugh pleeaaase Main Wiki Staff guys thingys people DON'T CHANGE IT TO THAT PIECE OF CRAP! }} | | Anyway, this is big trouble, you guys seem to be...handling it but I don't think some of us..less caffine and sleepless editors (you know the ones who don't have thousands of edits)) could really adapt to the situation of moving. Overall no one can really adapt to this decomposed baby fat. I'm not saying it enough but the skin is CRAP! Ugh pleeaaase Main Wiki Staff guys thingys people DON'T CHANGE IT TO THAT PIECE OF CRAP! }} |
|
| |
| {{ST|text=ok, so after they decided to switch it to Oasis automatically for us all i decided to try and navigate the wiki as is and try and deal with it, and now i can't help but wonder: WHAT THE HELL WIKIA!!!! Are the people who run this thing listening to ''anything'' the protestors are saying? I would love to hear their reasons for putting this piece of crap as the permanent skin. I'd be cool with it if it was optional, that way if you like it, fine, if you don't, that's fine to. We shouldn't have to be forced to look at this POS. Wake up, Wiki, you're gonna lose a Helluva lot of business for this}}
| |
| {{KrytenKoro|Re:Shard - I'm very interested to know who WoWwiki is moving to, because if they can handle WoWwiki, they can absolutely handle us.
| |
|
| |
| As for the old wiki concern - as long as the top-content producing editors move along with the wiki, that will cease to be a concern pretty soon. As you can see with [[wikia:transformers|the transformers wiki]], the wikia version quickly fell into the rubbish bin when the top editors moved away and left the old address to anyone who wanted it. Yes, Google favors wikia and wikipedia, but only to an extent, and once we make our site the premier place (and keep up our affiliations, very important!), we will replace them. We could even go further by seeking out affiliations with other KH-related sites, including webcomics (ex: Ansem Retort).}}
| |
| {{KrytenKoro|Also - to circumvent the "advertising" concern - when we move, we should not post "Hey, come to our new address". We should post something along the lines of "The previous editors of this wiki have moved to a new address, (link). Anyone visiting this site is free to to edit it as they wish and build their own community, or may join the previous community at its new location. If you would like to inquire about obtaining staff rights, please contact (wikia staff member<!-- whose inbox we want to swamp-->). This notice will be removed (three months later)." That cannot be construed as advertising the new site - it is merely stating where everyone has gone, and if anything advertises the ''current site'' -
| |
|
| |
| so when wikia takes it down and bans the person who put it up there, like they've been doing on other wiki's, it's just more proof that they are power-mad despots.}}
| |
|
| |
| OH DEAR GOD. The new wikia skin sucks.I was so confused at where everything is that I just turned it off. :P [[User:UltimateExplosiveHeartless]]
| |
| {{Dan da Man36|time=20:46, October 20, 2010 (UTC)|halloween=Has anyone else noticed that [http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb8/kingdomhearts/images/8/89/Wiki-wordmark.png this] image is appearing instead of the trio logo? Why is that?}}
| |
| :'cause Sannse put it there.[[User:KrytenKoro|(ಠ_ೃ)]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>Bully!</small>]] 21:13, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::Alright... Why...? {{User:Dan da Man36/Sig}} 21:18, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| {{The Inexistent|angry='''This load of bullsh*t is really pissing me off. All they say is random responses. "It's being worked on" or "Deal with it"... my ass! They just don't listen. And, from what I've read above, we can't agree on any place to move, because, let's face it guys, up until the new skin, Wikia was the best wikifarm out there. Oh, and dan, it's because we wouldn't give in and make a new logo.'''}}
| |
|
| |
| {{17m|angry= seriously, I'm getting the pitchfork}}
| |
|
| |
| {{SannseTalk|time=15:45, October 21, 2010 (UTC)|text=Dan: I wanted to give an example of how the Monaco theme and logo could be transferred over (and I actually like fiddling around with logos and backgrounds in my spare time)
| |
|
| |
| The Inexistent: We listen, but we can't always do what people ask us to. Here's an example: we've had editors say they don't like the new horizontal navigation. But our usability guys said it would work better, and so we went with it. This is ''very'' early data -- but it looks like click tracking is showing that the new navigation is used by visitors twice as much as the old. So what editors say is part of all this, and there's been changes because of that. Then there's data, and testing, and so on.... which is why it all takes time.}}
| |
|
| |
| {{ST|text=Ok, quick note, i'm not sure if this is a glitch with oasis or something, but everytime i scroll down on a page it pops back up to the top after a couple of seconds, again not sure if that's just a glitch with oasis or my computer or what. On another note, here's my thing: Why does Oasis have to be the required skin? if you want it to be an option or even be the default skin, that's fine, but at least give us the ''choice'' of going back. I would have no further complaints if we simply don't ''have'' to use this}}
| |
|
| |
| {{Soxra|text=''"Why does Oasis have to be the required skin? if you want it to be an option or even be the default skin, that's fine, but at least give us the choice of going back."''
| |
|
| |
| Yeah. That's what this whole debacle is about. Them forcing their crap on us. As for the glitch, just blame it on the fact that A) Oasis is much slower to load and B) it's just terrible in general.|time=<span style="font-weight: bold; text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px #000000;">[[ [[User:Soxra|<span style="color: #FFC000;">So</span><span style="color: #CC0000;">x</span><span style="color: #FFC000;">ra</span>]] ]]</span> 16:05, October 21, 2010 (UTC)}}
| |
| {{LevL|time=17:54, October 21, 2010 (UTC)|text=Sannse: I understand that you cannot always do what people want you to do. But this is different. I have not seen anybody who said that he/she liked the new skin. It seems as though almost everybody is complaining about it. And yet you choose to change it, only because some Wikia guys think this will work better? Apparently you do not really care what the users think. Something is not better only because more people click on it. And even if the horizontal navigation is better than what we have now, there are plenty of other things that are worse than they are now.
| |
|
| |
| Have you ever considered to make the new skin optional? I hope you did. I hope you ''do''. Seriously, if you do not want to ruin Wikia, you should make this skin optional, otherwise you will lose a big part of you community.}}
| |
|
| |
| Well, if one user's breaking out the pitchfork, then I'm grabbing my... oh, wait. I don't have a weapon. I have claws. I'll go buy a torch. *brick'd* [[User:UltimateExplosiveHeartless]]
| |
|
| |
| {{iZerox|time=22:20, October 21, 2010 (UTC)|sad=I hear many people saying mean and even hateful things. I understand their opinions and I also dislike the skin. But I'd like to think about this rationally. Sannse, did you ever consider the fact that perhaps the upper navigation gets more clicks because users are more confused by it? Perhaps the increase in clicks is directly related to the confusion on the end of us users. Perhaps the original side navigation is just so neatly organized that it can be used to navigate efficiently to where you want to go and then easily to other pages from the new page without the sidebar because you were able to get where you wanted to go in the first place?
| |
|
| |
| I'm just trying to approach the issue from another angle. And I also agree that the skin should be optional and not forced.}}
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| So, as a completely comupter-dummy and only reader, how do I get the old Look of the KH-wiki back???
| |
| The new one is just awful and just badly arranged. The entire order of the wiki is messed up...same applies for Final Fantasy wiki and wookiepedia... [[Special:Contributions/93.223.143.93|93.223.143.93]] 10:32, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| {{Uxie|time=11:22, October 22, 2010 (UTC)|text=''Hate that skin, hate that skin!''
| |
|
| |
| Seroiusly, I hate it so much! So does ZACH and Aura24. I have moved my Wiki (Spyro Wiki) to ShoutWiki, but even though it's far better than Wikia, it's far harder to edit there. Not to mention that the recent changes is very ugly. Another thing: if you was to keep the title as '''Kingdom Hearts Wiki''' there, you have to add '''Wiki''' at the end. I am not saying that you shoud move to ShoutWiki, but if you do, just tell me and I will help you.
| |
|
| |
| Also, I checked out the Wiki list on top of pages while under Oasis; Though I can now check out the wikis that I love, I just hate how the articles are crushed like a hoon's car. I am just about ready to scream (and not because of [[Jack Skellington]]'s awsome Halloween tricks, but because of this controversy all over these sites!)}}
| |
|
| |
| {{The Inexistent|sad='''So... Sans... you're saying that when Project Runway left Bravo and moved to Lifetime, losing so much that they had worked for, listening to the fans in the first place was a bad idea? And what about when Coke started making New Coke? Even though all statistics said "it will be better than the original", it failed and was accompanied by much outrage. Is that what Wikia will become? A washed up company that has to go to its old ways in shame?'''}}
| |
|
| |
| {{SannseTalk|time=02:30, October 23, 2010 (UTC)|text=ShadowsTwilight: That glitch should be fixed now, it was something to do with how the skin was loading on IE
| |
| On keeping Monaco as an option: that would mean us putting a lot of our resources in to it. When we upgrade the wiki software, we would have to do everything twice to make sure both versions work. And as we develop new features of improve existing ones, we would have to go back to Monaco to make sure it all worked there. It's just not practical to maintain two advanced, complex skins instead of putting all our time and effort in to the new one.
| |
| LevL: This is a difficult time for all of us I think. A big change is hard, and what we don't want to do is simply react to the initial comments without giving everyone time to get used to what's going on. And we ''really'' want to be sure that we don't miss the voices of the "silent majority", that's why click tracking and other ways of "hearing" what people are saying matter too. (And, yes, we have had people say they love the new look... and I'm genuinely one of them... although I know it might sound like I'm saying that just because I'm staff)
| |
| iZerox: we don't know what it means yet... or even if it's a real effect :) it's way too early to tell that. I just wanted to share that because it shows the sort of thing we are looking at. We need to look at feedback ''and'' what happens in practice.}}
| |
|
| |
| {{The Inexistent|dl='''Oh, and next time you guys are going past my user page or are in the new skin, take a look at my page. The tiny space smashes all of the page together. ''But'' here's the kicker. There is nothing on the right side of the page on my browser. ''Nothing''. Just white space, where my page could be spread out a little more.'''}}
| |
|
| |
| {{ST|text=Sorry, Sannse, still jumping, and Inexistent, I know right, with everything all compressed and all that space wasted. It's like that on all the User pages and even on the articles. Sure there isn't as much space wasted on the articles, but there is still plenty that could be taken up by the actual article}}
| |
|
| |
| {{Uxie|time=11:39, October 23, 2010 (UTC)|text=Well, you cannot convert UxieLover, even if you try.
| |
|
| |
| I understand that you cannot handel two skins at once, but why put the rotten skin on when everybody hates it? All you just want to do is make eveyone love it. Tough luck; the Spyro Wiki is leaving. Sorry to be so rude, but I am very upset.}}
| |
|
| |
| {{LapisScarab|time=16:00, October 23, 2010 (UTC)|text=@Sannse: Really? People have said they ''love'' it? A challenge: prove it. I garuntee that for every user that supposedly loves this skin I can give you at least a dozen users that don't. As far as I'm concerned the "silent majority" (and the majority has been ''far'' from silent) doesn't exist. If there are people who like this skin and can come up with good reasons for why to keep it, it's ''their'' responsibility to speak up. As of now, it just seems like you're trying to make some imaginary support for the skin.
| |
|
| |
| Don't give me this crap about how having two skins is "too complicated". Right now there's ''three'', Monobook, Monaco, and Oasis. I realize that you alone aren't responsible for this, and I know we're kind of beating you up here, but I'm on my last nerve. You aren't listening to us, you're just being patronizing.
| |
|
| |
| And that scrolling glitch is still sort of going on. It only happens once every time I load the page and it may just be that I'm scrolling down too fast too early, but it's yet another problem that didn't exist with Monaco.}}
| |
|
| |
| {{ST|text=It doesn't even happen just when scrolling, i think it happens every time the page reloads. Go to a page with tabs in the infobox. every time you click on a tab, it jumps straigh back to the top. And, i agree, "silent majority" sounds like a term used by someone who can't accept their own failures}}
| |
|
| |
| I'm not joking about that "for every one who likes it there's 12 who dislike it" thing. Say you found ten people that absolutely loved it. I don't care if they're staff or not, they just ''love'' this skin. Well, [http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Athena32 here's] 108 people, and counting, that don't.{{User:LapisScarab/Sig}}18:40, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| {{Soxra|mad=Sannse, firstly I'd like to say that I admire you for having the courage to actually post on our forum thread about this. It takes guts to step into the crossfire of one of the largest issues we've faced on Wikia in recent history.
| |
|
| |
| With that being said, I want to say that I have to agree with LapisScarab. Honestly, it does not feel like ANYone is saying they love it. I've seen revolt here, and on the AWA... just Google "Wikia oasis skin" and you will see how many hosted Wikis have considered moving (that's right--moving, leaving, 86-ing, whatever you want to call it) because of this enforcement.
| |
|
| |
| Why even create the new skin to begin with? It doesn't even sport local Wiki logos (like our little icon of Ventus & co. up there in the top left). If you can't handle supporting two skins (which you can, by the way--Monaco & Monobook), then don't make more and force us to move.
| |
|
| |
| Take a look at [[User:Soxra|my userpage]] using the Oasis skin, then look again using the Monobook skin; then, tell me it looks as good or better on Oasis. You can't.
| |
|
| |
| Here's what you should have done, and still should. If you want to instate a new skin, make a vote open to all Wikis. Each Wiki can hold a poll and their admin can give you a yay/nay from the masses. I bet if you had done this, it never would have gotten this far. I'd bet ''a lot'' on that.
| |
|
| |
| So this is just my $0.02 but based on reactions across the board I'd say I'm not the only person thinking it. I'm glad you came here to give your little speech but now it's time for a response--justification of what you're doing. All our cards are on the table; it's time to show your hand.|time=<span style="font-weight: bold; text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px #000000;">[[ [[User:Soxra|<span style="color: #FFC000;">So</span><span style="color: #CC0000;">x</span><span style="color: #FFC000;">ra</span>]] ]]</span> 18:45, October 23, 2010 (UTC)}}
| |
|
| |
| {{TalkSephiroth0812|text=I can only second Soxra's statement. I've looked around a bit and also in the german branch of wikia I've noticed nearly all reactions were mostly negative. Even some unregistered users complained in comments that they can't read their favorite wikis properly anymore because the articles are messed up with symbols and images overlapping. Worse is they're stuck with the new skin and don't even have a chance to revert it...}}
| |
|
| |
| {{Galexgan|time=02:24, October 24, 2010 (UTC)|terra2=@Sansse: The silent majority was the Tea Party'ers before they made their movement, if there is a silent majority for this skin then they aren't only being silent they've freakin gone into exile to live as hermits because not only are they not being heard but their not seen anywhere either.}}
| |
|
| |
| {{Uxie|time=02:37, October 24, 2010 (UTC)|text=I don't think she's going to listion, anymore. I've already created some nooses for those who love the skin of Darkness!}}
| |
|
| |
| {{17m|text= Just because you have the power, doesn't mean you won't listen to what people said. You're trying to make improvements for the wikias right? But here is what happened: '''It Failed'''. It's clear that a lot of people don't like the new skin, and yet you're forcing us to use the skin. What are you trying to proof really? That the new skin will be better than the older ones? If that's what you're thinking then you need to look at it from our perspective. Sure it looks nicer with the gloss and stuff, but it's not efficient. We're trying to give informations here, not showing off with good looks and stuff. If you can make the wikia look good AND efficient, then that's fine, we'll happily use that skin, but as I mentioned before, the new skin caused too much problem, it's not efficient, people won't be reading our articles because it's so messy. Think about that, will you? I know the staffs put a lot of hard work into this, but this is not working out. I know we never give you anything in return for the services you provide us, but what's the use of making changes and improvements if the majority of us won't like it or even use it?}}
| |
| i like the new skin[[Special:Contributions/76.108.34.28|76.108.34.28]] 16:44, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| {{OavatosDK|time=16:57, October 24, 2010 (UTC)|text=At the very least why can't wikia let all wikis set Monobook as the default? Why should Unencyclopedia get special treatment?
| |
|
| |
| (Posting here because Sannse hasn't commented at all on the FFWiki.)}}
| |
|
| |
| Monobook is still available in Preferences. You can change it to that if you want to (for now).--'''<span style="font-family:papyrus">[[User:LapisScarab|<span style="color:midnightblue;">Lapis</span>]]<span style="color:black;">Scarab</span></span>''' 17:07, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| {{Keyblade0|time= 17:13, October 24, 2010|text= @78.567-whatever. Please tell me that the mysterious person is joking. I mean, how can you ''like'' the new skin? It’s horrible! There are way too many problems with the new skin. Twice, I’ve tried it, and it was horrible. It felt like I’ve left the website, and gone into a wasteland! It’s unconstitutional that anyone should like that horrible new skin. I mean, what good does the new skin provide, besides making all the Wikis leave Wikia. It’s bad, “erases” pages, has many glitches, and causes everything to run slow!(And my CPU is fast!). Why change it, if it’s going to cause all of this? Just erase the new skin, or let it be optional. }}
| |
|
| |
| {{ST|text=now,now let's playe fair, Keyblade0. Ok, so we finally have a normal uer who actually likes it, and that's ok, that's ok everyone's entitled tol their opinions. So i guess now it puts the Hate/Love ratio to 34/1 on this page alone, not exactly in your favor, Sannse}}
| |
|
| |
| {{LapisScarab|time=19:11, October 24, 2010 (UTC)|text=It's still 35/0. Judging from the anon's edits, that is Keyblade0's unregistered account.}}
| |
|
| |
| ouch--[[User:ShadowsTwilight|'''<span style="color:#000000">Shadows</span>''']][[User talk:ShadowsTwilight|'''<span style="color:#505050">Twilight</span>''']][[File:Χ-blade (Incomplete) KHBBS.png|50px]] 19:14, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| {{The Inexistent|dusk='''Okay guys, she isn't listening anymore, so can we stop bitching and get back to the real discussion? <big><big>Are we moving, or not?</big></big>'''}}
| |
|
| |
| {{ST|text=if they're gonna be like that and not take our opinions into account, i guess we don't havea choice. congratulations, Sannse & co., all that hard work and all it's gonna get you is the loss of a s***-load of wikis. I hope you feel like you accomplished something}}
| |
|
| |
| {{Uxie|time=12:33, October 25, 2010 (UTC)|text=Sannse, congrats on LOSING many wikis. I am "proud" of you for your "awsome" skin!
| |
|
| |
| But then, where do we go? There is ShoutWiki (where I am moving my wiki to), but it's better that you decide. But I am just saying; if you want to move to ShoutWiki, then I can help you with that!}}
| |
|
| |
| {{TalkSephiroth0812|text= I'm actually neutral in this issue, as a total Wiki-newbie I've no idea how complex a complete move of all stuff would be, that's for the KH-Wiki staff to decide. The only thing I would ask is to be notified if a move takes place so that I may either register anew at the new provider or can then contact Uxie for the "relocation" help.
| |
|
| |
| One other thing, I read some of you have contact with the Final Fantasy-wiki, is their stance to this already settled?
| |
| And what about i.e. Wookieepedia for example...the Star Wars wiki is a quite big one, are they "satisfied" with this skin?}}
| |
| {{KrytenKoro|GUYS. STOP RAGGING ON SANNSE. She is trying to do her job, whether we think she should be asked to or not.
| |
|
| |
| Now, PLEASE, I'd like some opinions on which of the target options we've discussed would work. Even if we all agree to move the wiki, that can't proceed until we agree where we would move it ''to'', so if you guys don't like Oasis, you need to start comparing options pronto.}}
| |
| Since this is the "complain about it to no end" forum, maybe we should move the practical part of the discussion to a new page and start over there. --[[User:Neumannz|'''<span style="font-family:Gisha; color:#005400">Neumannz</span>''']], [[User talk:Neumannz|''<span style="color:black; font-family:Agency FB Bold">The Dark Falcon</span>'']] 16:07, October 25, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| That sounds good. {{User:Organization 13/Sig}} 16:31, October 25, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| {{Uxie|time=04:57, October 26, 2010 (UTC)|zoe=Yeah, okay. This page is getting too hard for us to edit on, anyway.}}
| |
| {{KrytenKoro|text=Also, Sannse, [http://kingdomhearts.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Azul81677&curid=3807&diff=416440&oldid=411854 this] might explain why you guys are getting more "clicks" with the new ToC.}}
| |
|
| |
| Okay, I read Sarah's blog about [[wikia:Community:User blog:Sarah Manley/Improving Accessibility on Wikia|the new look]] and I found out that while Monaco is being thrown away, they are keeping Monobook! Looks like they aren't forcing their shit in our faces after all! Either, they responded to the hate mail or they didn't tell us they were keeping Monobook, leading us to the conclusion that monobook is gone as well, scaring us to death. Anyway, monobook is back! [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] 21:24, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| {{SannseTalk|time=00:58, October 27, 2010 (UTC)|text=Sorry all, I couldn't get online as much as I wanted this weekend >_< I'm catching up now.
| |
|
| |
| The Inexistent: For most people, their watched pages show there, and on some wikis their achievement badges. There are likely to be other units in the future in that area, which is why it's been left ready for them
| |
|
| |
| ShadowsTwilight: The jumping problem has turned out to be more persistent than we thought... Sorry about that, we are looking in to it!
| |
|
| |
| LapisScarab: yes, there have been more negative comments than positive so far, I'm not trying to pretend otherwise. This is a long-term project, and we'll be tracking actual usage of the skin as well as direct feedback on it as it settles in.
| |
|
| |
| Monobook is not a complex skin with the same level of features as Monaco and the new look, so it's easier to keep that around. It's the two skins that we would need to actively maintain that matter here... it's just not practical to keep both I'm afraid.
| |
|
| |
| Sora: I agree, if we asked current Monaco users if Monaco is good enough, most would say yes. But we want to do more, and to provide a skin that works for as many visitors as possible: including future visitors. That's what we are trying to do with the new look
| |
|
| |
| 17master: the new look has only been live for a few weeks. I know that some will never get used to it, but it's way too soon to know how well our user testing matches the actual effect of the change.
| |
|
| |
| OavatosDK: Uncyclopedia is a parody of Wikipedia and so needs to look a bit like it -- it's a historical thing, they moved to us with that in place. It's not something we are extending to other wikis
| |
|
| |
| Keyblade0: games like that don't really help... but it does actually show one of the problems for those who ''have'' given positive feedback -- they get shouted down and sometimes even attacked for their opinions. Change is hard, and I understand the concerns people have about what's going on
| |
|
| |
| Everyone: Something I would suggest, give it some time. You have the right to copy the content to a new wiki whenever you want to... I'd really recommend living with the new look for a while, before deciding anything
| |
|
| |
| I hope I didn't miss anything in all that!}}
| |
| {{ST|text=While it is not unimaginable for people to get ''used'' to it, i don't find it concievable for people to ''appreciate'' it, especially with the articles being compressed to only taking up a quarter of the screen and yielding to absolutely nothing}}
| |
| What the hell were they thinking!?! Wikia are a$$holes! I simply canNOT navigate with Oasis! There are so many messups with it! Tabs don't work, pictures are fu%^ed up, everything is so badly f&*@ed up that I can't even use wiki with oasis! I don't even know how to edit and do my job anymore! #$&#%*@&#*$(%&! I suggest we move! Have a nice day, and thank you for choosing Mar rants airlineMar 02:21, October 29, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| And also, every logo changes with Oasis. Why would they change the logos? That is highly vandalism! [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] 22:46, October 29, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| {{ST|text=SON OF A BASTARD!!!!! WHY IS IT SO HARD FOR THESE PEOPLE TO LISTEN!?!?}}
| |
|
| |
| {{Soxra|mad=Sorry, Sannse. I can't see sense in anything you've posted. You want us to get used to this skin... and provide ample reason for future users to join Wikia. Then answer me this: Why do pages only take up a quarter of the width of the screen? People don't use 640x480 resolutions anymore--on my 1920x1080 laptop I can hardly stand to look at a page because of all the squishing that takes place. We rely on images to convey our encyclopedic content and you're just pushing them out. It doesn't work.
| |
|
| |
| Do whatever you want, it's your Wikia. But I'll urge you to keep in mind two things: 1) You shouldn't have to force change down the throats of everyone here. We get new users all the time--you can make Monaco look better without making a new skin. If you want to modernize it, leave it to the preferences menu. It's not too hard to maintain two skins at once. I've done it myself. (Don't just stuff technical jargon down our throats by saying it takes more resources--that's bull and you know it.) And 2) Keep in mind the big picture here--with wikis leaving and users p/o'd, you're going to lose a lot of ad revenue and a lot of loyal people. Why would you place so much on the line for so little gain?
| |
|
| |
| As said, do what you want--but there's the bigger picture.|time=<span style="font-weight: bold; text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px #000000;">[[ [[User:Soxra|<span style="color: #FFC000;">So</span>]][[User_talk:Soxra|<span style="color: #CC0000;">x</span>]][[User:Soxra|<span style="color: #FFC000;">ra</span>]] ]]</span> 17:09, November 3, 2010 (UTC)}}
| |
|
| |
| Actually the screen looks fine on all the computers i use, whether its my school, home, or laptop computers...maybe the problem just is with ur guys' computers? Idk, i'm just not sure why my computer looks fine with the new skin while all of urs dont... --Jacobmirror 14:31, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| {{TNE|time=20:32, November 6, 2010 (UTC)|angrytext=an Ankou is back, but only momentarily.
| |
|
| |
| One reason why I became inactive is because of my dissertation. '''The other is the new Wikia skin.''' I'm now implementing it on KHFR under my Prefs simply because newer users will automatically get this skin. But TBH, a lot of templates, including the Game template, have been really messed up, and to foul things up so bad requires a bad decision on someone's part. Now, we did everything we could reasonably do, and if it's still bad, it comes from :
| |
|
| |
| #Bad implementation.
| |
| #Bad implementation.
| |
| #<big>Bad implementation.</big>
| |
|
| |
| I've been trying to hold the Wikia Oasis edit window down for the last couple of minutes but everytime I do so, it keeps moving upwards. This problem was less frequent under Monaco, and though I haven't tried Monobook, I already have begun to have the impression that the new skin needs some serious reqorking, if it cannot be scrapped.
| |
|
| |
| Now, whilst I know everyone's doing his work, this is a serious tactical error where Wikia is concerned. I've already given my 2p for the skin in the past ; I'm just reiterating what I've said based on experience.}}
| |
