Editing Forms talk:Mickey Mouse

==Journal Entries==
{{NinjaSheik|text=I remembered when I was doing Mickey's that all of his journal entries from his past selves is already in his infobox, like Pete's. Sora's, Donald's, and Goofy's journal entries for their respective world changes are all in their Form pages, since it'd be way too long to fit them in their infoboxes. I want to ask, should  Mickey's journal entries be added to his Form pages to continue with the consistency? I think the pages would look better without the journal entries on the Form pages, to be honest. At the very least, should an exception be made for Mickey's and Pete's Form pages, considering that all of their journal entries are already in their infoboxes? It seems a bit redundant to have them on the Form pages, though I can understand why others see the necessary of them there? I'd like to hear others' opinions on the subject.}}

==KH1 version==

Shouldn't the KH1 version's image be removed since that outfit is sort of not canon anymore? Also, is there any render or anything of him from 0.2 without his shirt to use for the KH1 version's image instead? --[[User:Elfdemon|Elfdemon]] ([[User talk:Elfdemon|talk]]) 04:39, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Shouldn't the KH1 version's image be removed since that outfit is sort of not canon anymore? Also, is there any render or anything of him from 0.2 without his shirt to use for the KH1 version's image instead? --[[User:Elfdemon|Elfdemon]] ([[User talk:Elfdemon|talk]]) 04:39, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
-:Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't there a forum discussion about using render images (such as in this case)? Regarding the whole shirt/no-shirt, unless we're completely against renders, the image we currently have for KH works fine. The 0.2 version could be used as a comparison, or, as you said, a replacement. {{User:Xion4ever/Sig}} 02:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
-::It was still present in 1.5. KH0.2 may have retconned it, but it is still present in the official releases and should be covered, even if it is covered as "obsoleted".{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 17:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)