Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| ::Hmm, not sure, did renders come up during 1.5? And if not, should we consider renders to be the same as screenshots, or should they be a separate thing?--{{User:ShadowsTwilight/Sig}} 00:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC) | | ::Hmm, not sure, did renders come up during 1.5? And if not, should we consider renders to be the same as screenshots, or should they be a separate thing?--{{User:ShadowsTwilight/Sig}} 00:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC) |
|
| |
| :::<s>My views is that there is a key difference between the renders (mainly, texture quality) that warrants them being different enough. Especially since we aim to archive all possible appearances of that character, what we plan to do, goes against it. Even if it's something as minute as just texture quality.</s> Never mind, was under the impression we were keeping renders regardless of their quality. {{User:Erry/Sig}} 09:01, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| Official renders =/= cutscene screenshots. --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 03:38, 25 June 2014 (UTC) | | Official renders =/= cutscene screenshots. --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 03:38, 25 June 2014 (UTC) |
| :As far as I remember, official renders of the same pose/features were uploaded over the original KH images. Any new pose/features were created under a new KH HD naming system and added to [[:Category:Kingdom Hearts HD 1.5 Remix character images]]. I believe Shard mentioned this before on this page...In my opinion, if the images are the exact same, I'm okay with uploading over the old image. However, that throws our naming policy out of whack unless we're okay with not having the "KH HD 1.5/2.5" in the title. Having two separate images will probably add some images to the unused category, but it keeps our naming policy nice and "clean." {{User:Xion4ever/Sig}} 03:57, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
| |
| ::So, from what I'm getting, it really comes down to which of the two we see as the lesser of two evils, having a few renders that bend the naming policy rules, or having a bunch of unused images? Personally, I feel it would be better just to have them uploaded over the original image seeing as, like I said earlier, it would only be bending the rules of the policy, not breaking them, as saying that this is from KH II FM isn't completely inaccurate seeing this technically is the render of LW as he appears in the KH II FM portion of KH II.5. I personally think that's a little "cleaner" then having a bunch of unused images--{{User:ShadowsTwilight/Sig}} 20:13, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
| |
| :I get what you're saying Erry, but in the wake of the release of the HD 1.5 ReMIX and now the HD 2.5 ReMIX many renders resurfaced we had already uploaded here (most the of the Disney characters). That leads me to the conclusion that these are really the old image material back from the first release. The "new" Lingering Sentiment render uses exactly the same pose as the "old" one, it's not more detailed, it just more colorful because it isn't a scan, so I guess it is the same old image. Furthermore we shouldn't over-evaluate the work SE does for the Remixes, with the exception of the Sora, Riku, Kairi and Ansem SoD (all new models) only the Stations of Awakening featured new textures in the 1.5 HD ReMIX. I guess that will be the case for the next one too where only BBS will get textures double the size of of the original PSP release.<br>
| |
| :I could talk all day about these issues. For example back in the first KH Ultimania many renders are used that look exactly like in the game while SE nowadays retouches them by making the face and poses look less akward and adds details here and there. If you compare these renders to the ones appearing in the Bradygames or Piggyback guide you will find some noticable differences, I think I've seen at least three versions of Riku in Dark Mode with the Soul Eater by now.<br>
| |
| :In the end I don't think it's that important, we don't have access to all this material and we probably never will. --{{User:ShardofTruth/Sig}} 20:30, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
| |